3-4-04 Bemerkungen über 1-18-02 Tatbestand
The Jesuits are on an all out rampage to flagrantly violate Sect. 6.6 of General 666-Computer Laws. Make sure to execute all those who are found guilty of violating Sect. 6.6 of General 666-Computer Laws. The times and dates of these executions should be noted on RUSSIAN BROADCAST NEWS. If we fail to carry out these executions, we will send the message that our laws are a joke and that we actually support (by default) violations of Sect. 6.6 of General 666-Computer Laws. IT IS ESSENTIAL THAT WE ENFORCE SECT. 6.6 OF GENERAL 666-COMPUTER LAWS or else our inconsistency will be used against us in future legal cases. We must be CONSISTENT in enforcing our laws. Check out today’s FL Today, to see what I mean about flagrant violations of Sect. 6.6 of General 666-Computer Laws☛all this needs to be investigated and those violators of Sect. 6.6 of General 666-Computer Laws must be arrested and executed. To show the world that we are enforcing these laws, I’d recommend we also use the guidelines in Sect. 66 of 666-Computer Laws for PLPs–that is, have these violators of Sect. 6.6 of General 666-Computer Laws cross-examined, make them give CONFESSION STATEMENTS and then execute them. If we don’t show the world that we are enforcing these laws, the Jesuits may lie and claim that we aren’t enforcing them. So, broadcast and advertise the executions on RUSSIAN BROADCAST NEWS.
A presentation needs to be made on RUSSIAN BROADCAST NEWS, which shows how serious and complicated the LOOPHOLE PROGRAMMING is on myself and on my mother (and other of my relatives). If we don’t show that we are dealing with a serious and difficult problem– and then the LOOPHOLE PROGRAMMING violations continue on myself and on my mother, it will appear that we support those LOOPHOLE PROGRAMMING violations. Let the public know that we have to unravel and replace very complicated and convoluted LOOPHOLE PROGRAMMING and that we cannot instantly delete and replace the illegal LOOPHOLE PROGRAMMING with good programming,–or else it may put the brain into shock (THIS NEEDS TO BE EXPLAINED ON RUSSIAN BROADCAST NEWS). Maybe even give an estimated time-frame (for about how long it may take to “fix” this LOOPHOLE problem on my mother and myself).
In the meanwhile, we need to show the world the progress we are making in fighting this battle of illegal LOOPHOLE PROGRAMMING and give the world continual updates about our progress (to let it be known that we are doing EVERYTHING to lick this problem because we DO NOT SUPPORT THE USE OF LOOPHOLE PROGRAMMING).
I want a comparison and contrast DECISION HISTORY (going as far back as necessary) done between Vladimir Putin and the Jesuit leader(s) regarding decisions made by Vladimir and the Jesuit leader(s) that would reveal whether Vladimir or the Jesuit leader(s) knew about LOOPHOLE PROGRAMMING at the time the decision was made. You can use 666-Computer HISTORIES to help in these DECISION HISTORIES. A study will be made of decisions made by Vladimir Putin and by the Jesuit leader(s) to see whose behavior, attitudes and/or actions indicated a knowledge of LOOPHOLE PROGRAMMING at the time those decisions were made. Any particularly STUPID decision (which clearly seemed to indicate a lack of knowledge of LOOPHOLE PROGRAMMING will be highlighted in the DECISION HISTORY). From a legal perspective, the stupid one wins–because the stupid one will (in all likelihood) be the INNOCENT one.
Also, it will be noted in the DECISION HISTORY, if any change in decision-making patterns occurred which would seem to indicate that Vladimir or the Jesuit leader(s) may have just (or recently) acquired knowledge of LOOPHOLE PROGRAMMING.
This is important, because when (and if) one of these leaders acquired knowledge of LOOPHOLE PROGRAMMING, that needs to be noted, because (obviously)–from that point on, their decisions would reflect a knowledge of the existence of LOOPHOLE PROGRAMMING (because LOOPHOLE PROGRAMMING has been used extensively in the terrorism war). So, it will be noted in the DECISION HISTORIES when the knowledge of LOOPHOLE PROGRAMMING was acquired (if this can be determined). This way we can determined WHO knew about the LOOPHOLE PROGRAMMING FIRST.
It will be logically assumed that whoever knew about LOOPHOLE PROGRAMMING first is the criminal who has been using (and continues to use) LOOPHOLE PROGRAMMING, especially if there is a wide gap in time between when Vladimir Putin found out about LOOPHOLE PROGRAMMING and when the Jesuit leader(s) found out about LOOPHOLE PROGRAMMING. If there is a wide gap in time between when Vladimir Putin found out about LOOPHOLE PROGRAMMING and when the Jesuit leader(s) found out about LOOPHOLE PROGRAMMING that needs to be emphasized.
The legally significant results of these DECISION HISTORIES [done on Vladimir Putin and the Jesuit leader(s)] will be presented on RUSSIAN BROADCAST NEWS.
I’ve written important new laws, check out the signature sections of my CONSPIRACY LAW documents for the updates and new laws.
If there is evidence that any of the judges (there were several) and/or any of the attorneys involved in my divorce case (in Washington state) or any of the attorneys in any of the legal matters related to the child custody issues (regarding my son) were UNWILLING AGENTs (while they handled any aspect of my divorce case or my child custody case), expose this on RUSSIAN BROADCAST NEWS.
I strongly suspect that Jesuits used attorneys and judges who were UNWILLING AGENTS, in order to twist the outcome of my divorce case and the outcome of child custody issues related to my divorce case. If this is true, I want this exposed on RUSSIAN BROADCAST NEWS. I felt that the outcome of my divorce case was very unfair and was slanted against me. I mean it’s ridiculous that I was expected to pay child support with my medical problems and my lack of work history in my marriage–and I most definitely should not have been labelled as mentally sick just because I felt the Catholic church was after me. It was a weird case (as most cases orchestrated by Jesuits are).
The outcome of the case was that since I was “mentally sick”, I wasn’t fit to be Erich’s mom and I lost custody of my son because I was determined to be mentally sick, and I couldn’t even see my son (without my ex-husband around to supervise the meeting).
However, it was determined that in spite of the fact that I was “mentally sick” and not able to take proper care of Erich and not entitled to have custody of my son, that I was somehow mentally healthy enough to hold a job that would pay me enough so that I would be legally required to pay child support to my ex-husband. Talk about being INCONSISTENT–THIS IS YOUR TYPICAL JESUIT SOPHISTRY. That’s why I strongly suspect that the outcome of my divorce case was determined by UNWILLING AGENTS.
Also, check out Washington state’s legal system (especially in relation to family law) and see if the Jesuits used UNWILLING AGENTS to change family law in Washington state, in order to pave the way for me (before I arrived in Washington state in 1999). I was giving signs in 1998 in South Carolina that I might divorce my husband.
In fact, check to see if UNWILLING AGENTS were used by the military to move me to Washington state (in 1999), because maybe the Jesuits felt that if Washington state had jurisdiction over my divorce case, that the outcome of my case would turn out more in the Jesuits’ favor– so maybe the Jesuits wanted me in Washington state, when (and if) I divorced my husband. I firmly believe that the judges and/or attorneys involved in my divorce and child custody case were UNWILLING AGENTS for the Jesuits, and I want this exposed on RUSSIAN BROADCAST NEWS.
Any UNWILLING AGENTS that were involved in the outcome of my divorce case or the outcome of any child custody issues (related to my divorce case)–I want this exposed on RUSSIAN BROADCAST NEWS. It is necessary to check to see who the IMPOSED PERSONs were that took over the UNWILLING AGENTS (that influenced the outcome of my divorce/child custody case). If the IMPOSED PERSONS were Jesuits (or connected to Jesuits) this needs to be emphasized and exposed on RUSSIAN BROADCAST NEWS.
I’m watching Bill O’Reilly on FOX News (time now is 8:35 p.m.)–they’re talking about some judge who won’t allow Christian symbols during Christmas (because he claims the symbols are Catholic), but he’ll allow Jewish menorahs and symbols from other religions. This is a weird ruling and very inconsistent (which is almost a dead give-away that we’re dealing with a Jesuit orchestrated legal case). I strongly suspect that this judge is an UNWILLING AGENT. Investigate all weird outcomes to legal cases and see if UNWILLING AGENTS are involved–if so, expose the UNWILLING AGENTS (and the Jesuit IMPOSED PERSONS) involved in legal cases that have strange rulings or outcomes (on RUSSIAN BROADCAST NEWS). It appears the Jesuits are trying to make themselves look like martyrs and want to create the impression that they are unfairly targeted (which is not a new tactic for Jesuits). That’s probably why they killed their own agent, Loree McBride.
When exposing any Jesuit involvements regarding UNWILLING AGENTS, always use the guidelines from Sect. 66 of 666-Computer Laws for PLPs.
Electronically signed: Gail Chord Schuler
Place: Melbourne, FL