Gabrielle Chana Independent Party MANDATORY membership to vote/hold public office in all Conspiracy Law honoring nations

Gab Share

10.0[a1a] Here is her party’s platform, taken from the US. Centrist Party platform and an addition she made in June 2019: https://gabriellechana.blog/2019/06/01/gabrielle-chana-independent-party-platform/

To protect, support and further justice and liberty in concert with national and societal needs. While needs and societies change, governance and its administrative responsibility does not. It is the job of governance to meet the needs of the nation and its people. Achieving higher levels of individual opportunity through education and awareness empowers independence. The Centrist Party will endeavor to promote policy based on due consideration of the Tenets to achieve its goals.

Accountability

We shall endeavor to hold ourselves accountable for our own actions and recognize that governments, groups and individuals all carry the burden of responsibility for their actions in word and deed, to their best ability.

Action

Actions speak louder than words. Actions driven by principles, value and common sense. Not relying on others to take or alleviate individual moral responsibility. We expect that government properly administrates the welfare of the nation but not that we should be a welfare nation. That individuals, governments and organizations take responsibility for decisions/actions.

Argument

Reasoned argument allows for the examination of perspectives from various points of view and including special interests. All argument should include relevant perspectives and be weighed with the aggregate need of the people and the nation. Groups shall not be given undue influence over individual needs and the common good. Arguments should thoroughly explore relevant points weighed with the health definition.

Balance

Examining short and long-term ramifications with regard to solution development is required. Voters and politicians need to disregard the election cycle and look beyond perceptions. We need to ask what is right for the people. While extreme measures may at times be necessary, ways and means to deal with problems by well thought out planning and consideration shall be the rule of thumb.

Consideration

Consideration of relevant factors and the relative health of a decision is the job of those tasked with such responsibility. Public need must not be restricted to corporate wealth building that excludes or diminishes the public need or the common good. Merit, need, resource and ramification must be considered in policy making.

Courage

Having the fortitude and the strength to deliver the needed political message, rather than the politically correct message should be adhered to at all times. Politicians should pay less attention to focus groups and polls, and stand up for what is right for the nation/region and the common good.

Criticism

Relevant criticism helps develop new ideas and formulate new solutions to changing circumstances. Closed-minded policies impede progress and negatively impact effectiveness of an administration. Short and long-term consideration enable the construction and implementation of solutions prone to success and adapt to circumstance rapidly as awareness of need develops.

Duty

To hold to our moral obligation and responsibility to get things done based on pragmatism. Our duty is to ignore appeal to emotion arguments that distract from reality to pander to a particular base. Our duty is to take the harder road of explaining why we need to support things that are not necessarily popular but required to help our communities move forward. Our duty is to not engage in political gamesmanship that favors biased agendas over reason. Our duty is to rely on evidence based reasoning and not sell, or support, ideas or platforms that are contrary to the needs of the people and the nation.

Equal

Equal rights were clearly an intention of Thomas Jefferson (United States) when he wrote the Declaration of Independence. Unfortunately due to the circumstance of the period equal rights were not as strongly held in the Constitution of the United States as had been illustrated in the apparent intention and spirit of the Declaration of Independence.

The Centrist perspective contains what we hope is in the spirit of reason and responsibility, as well as aligned with the brand of reasoning Jefferson imbued in the Declaration. It is not possible to know his full mind but Thomas Jefferson himself explained in 1825: “Neither aiming at originality of principle or sentiment, nor yet copied from any particular and previous writing, it was intended to be an expression of the American mind, and to give to that expression the proper tone and spirit called for by the occasion.”

In consideration of Jefferson’s stated intent, the Centrist goal is to promote equal access to opportunity based on merit in the pursuit of life, liberty and happiness. We include ‘reasoning, to the best of our ability’. Even that should be taken as a generalization to inspire progress in the evolution of humane civil society toward these ends, in the whole of consideration.

Reasoning is neither precise nor simple. That in and of itself is both a problem and a blessing of sorts. There is always room for improvement it seems. Our goal is to promote the spirit of the intention, inferred and/or ideal, and to support continued progress in the pursuit of equality:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, …”

These words contain the embodiment of the core of intent for the Centrist Party. That we are as a nation, the community of the Conspiracy Law honoring nations. As a people and as individuals. That our purpose is to build upon that which will strengthen this intent and build toward the furtherment of these “unalienable rights”, to the best of our reasoning ability, and in line with the pursuit of greater achievement of equality and responsibility.

Facts

Facts without context can be misleading. The CP is against the misuse of facts to spin, or manipulate a message can easily mislead people. Such salesmanship or undue ambiguity is discouraged. The CP encourages honest debate to support positions rather than politically evasive speech that caters to voters’ sentiments. As able, centrists should engage and fight for their positions, not avoid the definitive stance for political expediency.

Fairness

Acting in accordance with the rules or standards or in a legitimate manner considering group and individual needs as well as capacity. This includes just or appropriate action with regard to circumstance. This also includes short and long term consideration as well as individual, regional, state, national and international needs and capacities.

Individual

The development of the individual is held as the highest goal, above any group. Education is key. The richness and rewards of reason become stronger in a more empowered electoral base and enable a more reasonable government and economic environment. The founders of our nation sought to reduce group influence over individual rights through responsible governance.

Independence

While the human mind is subject to various degrees of influence, we shall endeavor to increase awareness through reasoned argument, education and application of common sense. We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty (Edward R. Murrow). Questioning our leaders is as patriotic as respecting the rights of individuals to dissent or agree as they so choose. Common sense should always be our guide.

Health

Is a policy or decision healthy? For the purpose of policy formation and consideration we are using the following model definition:

The Health Model Definition

Healthy: anything that reduces anxiety for Conspiracy Law honoring persons, simultaneously and/or consequentially, on an individual and/or group basis, with consideration of short, medium and long-term consequences.

Unhealthy: anything that increases anxiety, simultaneously and/or consequentially, on an individual and/or group basis for Conspiracy Law honoring persons, with consideration of short, medium and long-term consequences.

Honor

Being honest is easier than being honorable. Not just saying I did, or did not say “that”, but I ‘mean’ this or that. The world is tired of politicians that word craft their way in and out of positions and rely on popularity polls to figure out what they need to say next to pander to some special interest, or manipulate the electorate to get more votes or support for a piece of misnamed, mis-intentioned legislation. Political spin erodes the integrity of the vote and certainly that of the politician. To honor the electorate, candidates need to be motivated by the strength of their honorable and well-reasoned convictions.

Humility

To demand respect, rather than earn respect, as a method of governance is a mistake, which has been repeated throughout history. It has always resulted in the downfall of civilizations. Mistakes are not to be hidden, but communicated in order to increase wisdom. Hiding mistakes or using spin to characterize them in a misleading manner in order to foist the perception or illusion of a strong leader, is a terrible precedent to set. We need strong leaders, not ones that just want to look like strong leaders.

Integrity

Strength of conviction and an open mind are keys. Strength does not mean stubbornness, and leadership does not mean illusion. Pretending to change one’s mind merely to gain political favor with voters is dishonest and dishonorable. At the same time, changing one’s mind to adapt to the needs of the people to represent the needs of the people defines integrity. How are we to decide in the torrent of spin we are subjected to? To divine the difference is the challenge we face when listening to politicians and awareness of the problem is key to the solution.

Open-Mindedness

Being open-minded is critical to a fast changing environment. Flexibility and adaptation to new circumstances allows new understanding and methods to develop.

Pragmatism

Solutions must not bow to special interest agendas, unreasonable dictates not in the public interest, extremist positions or narrow vision.

Reason and consideration of the health of a decision, public need, economic stability, and short and long-term ramifications of choices and decisions must always be included in the process of administrating the public need.

Reason

Well-reasoned understanding results from exercising the tenets when approaching any given policy consideration. By applying the scope of the tenets with an open approach and communicating with involved entities, a well-reasoned policy is developed to meet the needs of the nation and the people.

Responsibility

That the Action of government should be primarily to administrate the needs of the nation and its people without undue influence from groups. That government actions should be founded in simplifying the manner of regulation with the goal of fair and equal opportunity gained by work and intellect for individuals not groups.

Strength

Conviction tempered by wisdom with humility and open-mindedness empowers reason within circumstance. Strength comes from challenges, not lethargy. To lay down one’s sword, be it the sword of reason or the sword of battle, is to accept defeat and slavery to the will of those that would impose upon our lack of will to stand and argue, or fight for that which we believe and that which we can own in our consciousness.

Value

That value is not just an economic principle but also a life principle, and that the value of our actions as well as our interactions should be considered fully. That our communities, our homes and our friendships should all be considerate of value, equity, balance and fairness. In this we may find a better way to exist as individuals, families and as a nation.

10.0 In all Conspiracy Law honoring nations that use elections to decide on their representatives or senators in any type of Congress, there must be an Independent Party called the Gabrielle Chana Independent Party. The by-laws of this GC Independent Party are Conspiracy Law (including https://gabriellechana.blog/2019/06/01/gabrielle-chana-independent-party-platform/) and the approach is Centrist (as outlined in Sect. 10.0[a1a], with a special emphasis on enforcing Gail’s National Health Care Plan in Sect. 55 of Conspiracy Laws and Government and on helping Gail Chord Schuler to enforce her Conspiracy Law).

10.0a Gail’s National Health Care Plan mainly keeps costs down by forcing all physicians in its network to only use National Health Care Plan attorneys for malpractice cases and all patients in the plan must agree to only use National Health Care Plan attorneys for any grievances they have over the quality of the care. This drastically cuts costs for both physicians and patients in the plan. To ensure malpractice does not occur, each care giver must be scanned before each intervention with his/her patient making a statement under 666-Computer lie-detection that he/she is giving the best care for this patient according to his/her judgment.

10.1 This is a government sponsored health care plan and is kind of like socialized medicine in that every person is covered, even the very poor and those who cannot afford health insurance. But it is unlike socialized medicine in that there is far less regulation and red tape, and lawyers are not able to bilk the system to make profits off of frivolous lawsuits. People pay into the program according to their income and enrollment is voluntary and those who have jobs can use their employer’s health care insurance coverage to pay into the plan, in that it is like another private health insurance plan, except it is subsidized by the federal government. It competes with the existing health plans out there, but is a government sponsored plan and is integrated with Medicaid, Social Security and whatever current government sponsored programs are out there right now. The premiums are extremely low due to the fact that all doctors can only have the malpractice insurance of the plan which is extremely cheap. They are given free lawyer service and are required to use our lawyers.

10.2 Health care professionals run the plan according to their percentages in the plan. So if 90% of caretakers are M.D.’s then that must be how many M.D. are administrators. Animal health care, chiropractic, acupuncture, alternative medicine and traditional medicine are covered as long as it is determined that the health care works and is not a fad. There are no pre-existing condition limitations. You are not punished if you are already sick. Even alternative medicine that is over-the-counter is covered, but it is also monitored to ensure the patient gets a quality product that works.

10.3 To sum it up, the national health care plan will operate like a huge federally sponsored HMO, except that licensed medical persons (physicians, veterinarians, dentists, etc.) will be the administrators of the national health care plan and the charges will be based on a percentage of a person’s income (those with greater incomes pay more every month to be in the plan), but the minimal co-pays will be the same for all (for those who have to pay co-pays). However, because there are so many persons in the plan, it is expected that the monthly premiums will not be as steep as private health insurance has been, and more comprehensive coverage can be given to all persons and all legal persons in the country can be covered in the plan.

10.4[a1b] All current representatives of the people of a Conspiracy Law honoring country must take an oath (under 666-Computer lie and emotion detection) to honor the principles of Sect. 10.0[a1a] of this section of Conspiracy Law and to honor Conspiracy Law in general. Those who fail this oath must be removed from office and an election or appointment (for appointed government leaders) must take place to replace them with an alternative from their party. Nobody can run for (or be appointed to) any political office in a Conspiracy Law honoring nation until and if they pass the oath described in this Sect. 10.4.

10.4[a1c] Due to the entrenchment of the dual party system in many countries, eliminating the parties won’t work. Therefore, people can remain in their political party but they must agree to honor the principles of Sect. 10.0[a1a] and Conspiracy Law regardless of their party, or they cannot hold a public office.

10.4[a1d] To ensure allegiance to Sect. 10.0[a1a] and 10.4[a1b], nobody can run for (or be appointed to) any public office in a Conspiracy Law honoring nation unless they pass a course about Conspiracy Law. This course will be designed by Judge Terrance Jenkins, who has a degree in law from Harvard University. Terrance can get help in designing the course from specialists in the field of education, all he must do is approve the course to ensure elected officials understand Conspiracy Law and are therefore able to help the President/head of state and Empress Gail enforce her law in the countries where she governs. All current elected or appointed public officials need to pass this course about Conspiracy Law within six months from March 24, 2018. The course will only be difficult enough to understand Conspiracy Law precepts to the extent that lawmakers or those elected or appointed officials who influence the laws will understand how to write laws and/or vote for laws that honor Conspiracy Law for their country or the group of people that they represent.

After passing their course they must take the oath as outlined in Sect. 10.4[a1b]. If they fail, they must be removed from office and replaced (either through a vote or other means) with one who honors Conspiracy Law and Gail’s Centrist policies (Sect. 10.0[a1a]). If we are unable to replace them for whatever reasons, their post must be eliminated or their votes and all their actions will be ignored (won’t be able to influence anything). All those who take the oath and pass will have a new name, so let’s say the person is a Democrat, they will be called Gabrielle Chana Democrat Tom Schumer (for instance), or if they are a Republican, they will be called Gabrielle Chana Republican Paul Randall (for instance). The title Gabrielle Chana will be a prefix before their party affiliation as part of their title. Or, in Russia, Gabrielle Chana United Russia Vladimir Putin. In other words, they will be members of two parties, the Gabrielle Chana Independent Party and their respective party. NOBODY in any Conspiracy Law honoring country who is a representative can hold elected or appointed office if they are not a member of the Gabrielle Chana Independent Party. This means that if a person is NOT a member of the Gabrielle Chana Independent Party, but are a member of the Democratic Party, for instance, they are ineligible for public office. And nobody can be a member of the Gabrielle Chana Independent Party running for/holding political office unless they pass a course about Conspiracy Law and take an oath (which they pass under 666-Computer lie detection) that they honor Conspiracy Law and the principles of Sect. 10.0[a1a] of this document.

Any willing and knowing (direct or indirect) attempt or action to violate the principles of this Sect. 10 of this document will bring the death penalty as a Jesuit Conspirator to that violator, because evil Jesuits use partisan politics to block Conspiracy Law and make it of no effect, and also try to use partisan politics to impeach legally elected officials with lies, rumors and fanatical rantings and ravings, driving the nation to hysteria with the intent to set up a dictatorship with an evil Jesuit ruler.

10.4a In this section 10 of Conspiracy Laws & Government, a representative is defined as a person elected by the people (or appointed to office) to represent them in some sort of Congress (like in the U.S.), whether that person has the title of Representative, Senator or whatever OR in an appointed position, like Secretary of State, Vice President, U.N. Ambassador, etc. It is mandatory that we create a new political party in those countries that have political parties called the Gabrielle Chana Independent Party and that ALL public officials must be a member of this party. So, in the U.S., for instance, no election (or appointment) can take place for any House, Senate seat or any political office, unless all those running (or appointed) belong to the GC Independent Party as well as to their respective party. It is permissible to ONLY belong to the GC Independent Party, if the candidate chooses to do so. Current representatives have the option to switch from their current party to the GC Independent Party if they desire to do so at this time.

RULES FOR GENERAL ELECTIONS or ELECTIONS INVOLVING MORE THAN ONE PARTY:

10.4a1 To ensure that eligible candidates (those that honor Conspiracy Law and are members of the Gabrielle Chana Independent Party) are not prevented from running in a general election (or elections involving more than one party), any candidate running for office (regardless of party) that garners at least 4 to 8 percent of the total vote (according to a poll that honors Conspiracy Law, meaning only those who honor Conspiracy Law are polled) in their state or area involved in the vote MUST BE ON THE BALLOT in that state or area.

10.4a2 It is illegal to require a certain amount of money to be raised before a candidate can be considered eligible to be on the ballot. All eligible candidates should be allowed on a ballot, even if they don’t have money. It is far too easy for the elite to block funds from reaching eligible candidates. Eligibility must be determined by polling alone (and the poll must honor Conspiracy Law). We can do brain scans of the population to determine who is eligible to be on the ballot and these should be the basis for our polls. Those who present poll results to the public must present them accurately as determined by accurate brain scans. We can tell by brain scans how people will vote. Those who willingly and knowingly present false polling information to the public, with the intent to assist Loree McBride Jesuits will get the death penalty as a Jesuit conspirator.

10.4a3 Also, any political party (Green, Libertarian, etc.) that has at least 4 to 8 percent of the voters in a state or area must also be on the ballot, if that party has a candidate running in that state or area. The way it will be determined if a voter or candidate belongs to a particular party, will NOT be by their voter or candidate registration but by what our brain reads determine that voter’s party to be. We will create profiles for each political party and then scan the eligible voters and candidates to see where they best fit on that profile. Those who create these profiles for each candidate, party or voter must pass a 666-Computer lie-detection after they make their decisions stating that they have created profiles that best describe the party and have placed voters/candidates where they best fit. If they fail this 666-Computer lie-detection, they must be sacked and their judgments don’t count and somebody else must do their job. No decision can be made about where to place candidates or voters as a party without passing 666-Computer lie-detection as outline in this section.

10.4a4 So, let’s say a Democrat, who is actually a Green (according to our profile) will be listed as a Green when we determine where to place that voter or candidate as a party. The Gabrielle Chana Independent Party must have at least one candidate in EVERY election that takes place. If no candidate is a pure Gabrielle Chana Independent Party believer, then we will choose the one who is closest to that as the one running on the Gabrielle Chana Independent Party for his/her area.

10.4a5 All decisions over where to place candidates or voters by party will be based on brain scans. This way all parties will get fair representation in every election and establishment parties (like the Republican and Democratic parties in the U.S.) will be prevented from having unfair monopolies.

10.4a6 We will determine where to place candidates or voters by party (by brain scans). The brain scan that matches a party’s profile is where the candidate must be placed on the ballot, regardless of how they are registered. Let’s say a candidate is determined to best align with the pure Gabrielle Chana Independent Party Platform, that candidate must be listed as a member of the Gabrielle Chana Independent Party on the ballot, regardless of how they are registered.

10.4a7 Let’s say a candidate best aligns with the Republican Party (according to brain scans), that candidate must be listed on the ballot as Republican, even if they are registered as a Democrat.

10.4a8 You might say, this is not fair. You are not allowing people to register how they like. To the contrary, it is very fair, because current voter registration laws limit some parties from representation that deserve representation, forcing people to register for parties that don’t align with their views, because they see no other options.

10.4a9 To ensure that all candidates who garner at least 4 to 8 percent support are represented fairly in debates. Let’s say a debate features all candidates for a country that have registered as Democrats. But some candidates cannot raise the required money or do not poll well (using illegal and inaccurate Jesuit polling methods). Those that garner at least 4 to 8 percent support in their party (using our brain scans) MUST be allowed to attend debates for their party (based on which party they actually belong to according to our scans). So, let’s say Tulsi Gabbard fails to meet the requirements to participate in the Sept. 2019 Democratic debates and we determine she’s really a Green. Those who garner at least 4 to 8 percent support (regardless of party) must be allowed to debate with others of their true party on national television, even if the only channel that gives them a forum is Gabrielle Chana FOX News. Raising a certain amount of money cannot be a requirement for eligibility for debates on Gabrielle Chana FOX News or whatever channel is chosen as the debate stage for the candidates who have been marginalized from representation on the established debate stage. A candidate is considered marginalized if they garner at least 4 to 8 percent in brain scan polling, but are unable to raise the require money or polling required (because of illegal and inaccurate Jesuit methods). Once the primaries are decided and each party has picked their candidate, the leftovers who didn’t make it, can all run as Gabrielle Chana Independent Party candidates on the general election ballot (as long as they garner 4 to 8 percent of the vote according to brain scans). These leftovers will also be allowed to participate in debates on the Gabrielle Chana FOX News channel, so this means that the debates, even for the general election, will have all candidates who garner at least 4 to 8 percent of the vote for whatever area that the vote encompasses. So, let’s say the Republicans pick Donald Trump and the Democrats pick Joe Biden, but other candidates get in the 4 to 8 percent range, those other candidates will be allowed to debate each other on Gabrielle Chana FOX News or whatever channel decides to be the forum for those who have been marginalized and Donald Trump and Joe Biden must join in on these debates, even if by Skype only. We must really get away from monopolies in political systems, because this only further entrenches the Loree McBride Jesuit Deep State. The candidate’s party will be decided by brain scans. This means the final election results should really be the VOTE OF THE PEOPLE and not the reinforcement of the ESTABLISHMENT CANDIDATES.

10.4b So, for instance, in the U.S., for every Senate or House seat that requires an election to be filled and for any and all political appointments, all candidates running (or appointed) must belong to the GC Independent Party or that election (or appointment) is not considered valid. At a minimum each candidate must belong to the GC Independent Party, but he/she may also belong to another political party outside of the GC Independent Party. As you’ll notice, the principles of the Centrist Party are designed to prevent partisan gridlock (used by enemies to Conspiracy Law in Parliaments and Congresses to create blockades against Conspiracy Law). This person running as (or appointed as) a GC Independent must be actively campaigning to win his/her seat (or be in serious consideration for an appointment) and must have full intention of trying to become the representative for the people of his/her district.

10.4c This GC Independent candidate must make a sworn statement under 666-Computer lie detection before the public that he/she to the best of their ability will try to enforce laws that will honor Conspiracy Law in their country. The by-laws of the GC Independent candidate will be Gail Chord Schuler’s Conspiracy Law.

10.4d Because Gail’s Conspiracy Law is flexible and allows for a diversity of government operations, Gail will allow competing political parties under any Conspiracy Law honoring nation, allowing the competing parties to enact and create legislation that may be in addition to Gail’s Conspiracy Law in the land. However, none of this legislation can be used to try and annul or make void any aspect of Gail’s Conspiracy Law. Forcing all candidates to belong to the GC Independent Party only forces them to govern with integrity and balance, considering the needs of the people above partisan politics.

10.5a By the same token, whoever is the public head of state in the land on mainstream news, is also allowed the same privilege to enact and put into laws, legislation that is an addition to Gail’s Conspiracy Law, so long as that law does not contradict or make null any aspect of Gail’s Conspiracy Law. This new law means that the current U.S. President (who is an elected official) must belong to the Gabrielle Chana Independent Party as well as to the Republican Party. So his title would be Gabrielle Chana Republican Donald Trump. Or if he chooses to divorce himself from the Republican Party, his title would be Gabrielle Chana Party Donald Trump.

10.5b Should it be discovered that any lawmaker or public official is trying to overthrow Gail’s Conspiracy Law, that will be grounds for immediate impeachment of that person in their government office on the grounds of treason and an election (or appointment) must be held for their replacement according to this Sect. 10 of Conspiracy Laws and Government. Though, of course, the date of the election or appointment is optional and does not have to be Dec. 12, 2017. The way to determine if this is happening is that before any representative (public official) votes on, passes, or introduces any legislation or action that influences how the people in his/her district are governed, he/she must state under 666-Computer lie-detection that to the best of his/her knowledge and/or ability this action he/she is taking honors Conspiracy Law and the tenets of Sect. 10.0[a1a] of this document. If he/she fails to pass 666-Computer lie detection in this matter, his/her vote/action cannot count and he/she must be removed from office if he/she willingly and knowingly tried to violate Conspiracy Law. If he/she was extorted into a violation, their vote or influence just won’t count. In extreme situations where too many representatives (public officials) are extorted, a revote may need to be taken later at a time when the extortionist is removed. The U.S. President or his/her equivalent for the country can decide on if a revote is needed, and may make his move to do so, by refusing to pass the legislation (not signing or approving of the document). Again, any and all actions taken by a public official cannot go forward unless that official first passes 666-Computer lie-detection that he/she is honoring Conspiracy Law to the best of their ability. No action can go forward until and/if the person trying to enact that action passes 666-Computer lie-detection that they are honoring Conspiracy Law to the best of their ability with that action. Any willing and knowing (direct or indirect) attempt or action to bypass or violate Conspiracy Law in any action by any public official will bring the death penalty as a Jesuit Conspirator to that violator.

10.5c Due to the fact, that the current evil Jesuit leader, who is Loree McBride, is striving to undermine Gail’s Conspiracy Law using partisan bickering and infiltration to block Conspiracy Law, Gail feels the need to create a strong Independent Party (which is mandatory for all elected/public officials) to overthrow Loree’s gridlock over the House and Senate and Loree’s infiltration into public officials, which blocks enforcement of Conspiracy Law in the land.

10.6 Gail hopes that by requiring all elections and appointments, including the election for public head of state to belong to the GC Independent Party, this will eliminate gridlock or infiltration which is used by enemies of Conspiracy Law to stop it from being enforced in the land.

10.7 So for any and all elected positions that are partisan in nature and for all public officials, each candidate running for office or appointed to office must belong to the GC Independent Party or they are ineligible for office.

10.8 In the United States, a GC Independent candidate would hold Centrist political views and would neither align totally with Democratic or Republican viewpoints, but would be a person who just wants to do what works and is best for the country (in their view) regardless of whether it be liberal, conservative, Republican or Democratic in its leanings. They would not be bound to traditional and established party platforms, and their main emphasis would be to enforce and enact Gail’s Conspiracy Law. Those who belong to the GC Independent Party AND another party, must skew their party preferences to also align with the GC Independent Party.

10.9 Gail hopes that by creating these laws, that a strong GC Independent Party will emerge to become a mammoth in the political arena that no candidate can afford to ignore when he runs for office and is elected. And that as a result of these laws, people will vote for a person not based on their party affiliation, but WHO THAT CANDIDATE IS AS A PERSON. In other words, people will vote for a PERSON and not a PARTY.

10.10 All GC Independent Party candidates and public officials must be scanned each month to ensure they have not been replaced with clones or automatons or secretly killed off and must take an oath of office each month before the public that they admire Gail’s Conspiracy Law and devote all their efforts to enforcing and enacting it in their country. Those who fail this scan must be immediately impeached and replaced according to this Sect. 10 of this document.

10.11 Also, all registered voters in a country must also belong to the GC Independent Party as well as to their original party, so if they are a Democrat, their new party affiliation will be Gabrielle Chana Democrat, if they’re Republican, their new party affiliation will be Gabrielle Chana Republican and so forth. Independents will just belong to the Gabrielle Chana Independent Party. Nobody is qualified to vote unless they belong to the GC Independent Party and all votes must be conducted (according to Sect. 8 of Conspiracy Laws and Government). Donald Trump’s new party would then be GC Republican and he would no longer be accountable to the Republican Party for his actions and legislation, but rather to the people who all belong to the SAME party (the GC Independent Party). The purpose for the GC Independent Party is to remove evil Jesuits’ ability to use partisan politics to block legislation needed to enforce Conspiracy Law or to create legislation that blocks Conspiracy Law. Another purpose is to remove from all Loree McBride Jesuits the ability to vote or to influence appointments or infiltrate into the government. They are considered illegal and cannot belong to the GC Independent Party. To belong to the GC Independent Party, the voter must state under 666-Computer lie-detection that to the best of their ability they honor Conspiracy Law, though they don’t have to agree to all the tenets of the GC Independent Party as outlined in Sect. 10.0[a1a], but must agree to at least fifty percent of it. So if they pass lie detection that they honor Conspiracy Law and agree to at least fifty percentof the tenets of the GC Independent Party as outlined in Sect. 10.0[a1a] they can register to vote in the GC Independent Party and then be eligible to vote. Those who do not want to honor Conspiracy Law are not eligible to vote, since Conspiracy Law is the Constitution of the land and nobody can vote who does not honor the Constitution. The purpose for requiring them to agree to at least fifty percent of the tenets of the Centrist Party is to prevent unreasoning fanatics from destroying our political system.

10.13 A legal voter of any political party is allowed to vote in any election where a GC Independent is running for any type of office and is free to vote for the GC Independent or for anyone else competing with them on the ticket. The GC Independents are free to organize themselves into a viable political party holding conventions as needed to garner support and spread their message or whatever they choose to do as a political party to give themselves a voice and a presence, as long as their activities honor Conspiracy Law. It is also possible for an established political party to phase itself out and integrate into the GC Independent Party. For instance, Democrats could take a vote and decide they no longer want to be Democrats, but want to be considered the GC Independent Party. Or the same could happen with Republicans or Libertarians. In the end, all that matters is that all voters and those who hold office in government be GC Independents. What happens to the other political parties is irrelevant as long as the will of the people is honored in whatever happens and the GC Independent Party is always in existence and that all representatives belong to the GC Independent Party in all elections held in that Conspiracy Law honoring country. Gail has written these laws to remove partisan bickering which is often used by enemies of Conspiracy Law to blockade a head of state from enforcing and enacting legislation.

10.14 All leaders in our GC Independent Political party are required to listen to this broadcast from a business leader discussing effective leadership in secular operations with a Dallas Theological Seminary professor. Though this is a discussion with a seminary professor, the discussion could be easily part of a course in any good M.B.A. (Master in Business Administration) program. Gail wants all our leaders to be team leaders and not stars, believing this is the best approach to have a political party that will be a great influence in the countries they are in.




3 thoughts on “Gabrielle Chana Independent Party MANDATORY membership to vote/hold public office in all Conspiracy Law honoring nations

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *